Should Privacy Exist?

Should Privacy Exist?         Charles Platt discusses secrecy of the individual and the possibility of an accurate world under surveillance in his essay nowhere to Hide: Lack of Privacy is the Ultimate Equalizer. He explains the antithetical levels of secrecy unavoidablenessed in different cultures, and he describes wherefore he feels that invasion of privacy office lead to enormous institutions interfering in his feel. Platt points out cases where privacy became an issue, either because it reveals the righteousness or because the term ?privacy was being used as an excuse, to play the importance of an individuals right to privacy. Platt then describes the tools that are open for cut-rate sale to the public that can facilitate invading other heaps privacy. He feels that if everyone has no privacy then everyone becomes equal, which is an opinion that I do not share. Looking toward the future, he then predicts new tools that might be invented and how he is optimistic that the future will found less privacy and more surveillance on some(prenominal) domestic and macro levels. I feel that Platts opinions are contention far too much toward a world without privacy and thus I do not agree with spatial relation on surveillance.



I disagree with Platt about why people should be under surveillance: he believes it will achieve everyone equal, but I believe people should only be under surveillance if they are suspected of attempting to commit a crime. Thus, Platt is far too extreme in his views on surveillance.

        Platt begins his assembly line by stating that cultures other than our own have little need for privacy. The Japanese, for instance, dont even have a word for it?domestic privacy that is; the simple need to hide some of you home life from the neighbors. (Platt, 344) He also claims that most people do not...

If you extremity to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .