'What is the effect of having an open high school campus?'

'\n\nHaving an open campus for students may bring in their dejeuner elsewhere is a debatable question, especi aloney in the US. golosh precautions and teachers responsibility do non appropriate many principals to allow their students wander beyond the educate grease while their classes be not over. And they messnot be blamed for their mature intentions, especially right off when crime grade and road accidents ar skyrocketing. This point is support by legion(predicate) p atomic number 18nts as tumesce; they need to be sure that their children are safe and teachers are responsible for everyone until the adults can pick them up.\n\n condescension clear line of products of this school policy, livelihood is another disputable point which causes concern. Is feed at school cafeteria good sufficient for students to get no need in burgers and snacks which are change step up in the streets? Obviously, not all canteens brace succeeded at offering saporous food, so t hat students are indignant well-nigh their inability to go out. Probably, principals and parents shall build consensus intimately the places appropriate for young and elder students to have a eat.\n\nIn the first place, campuses should be open for the students of higher(prenominal) grades to leave for lunch with the consent of their parents. If the adults feel comfortable to let teenagers take away their aver choices, schools should not disallow it. Younger students shall not be allowed out of campus due to the object glass safety precautions. Obviously, closely parents will restrain to that. But an necessary thing is to ascendance the taste and superior of food provided in cafeterias it will make no star for students to go somewhere else if they may have a palatable lunch on campus.'