Art History Final

Marcel Duchamp and Andy Warhol , though separated by nigh 50 years and dissimilar cultures , produced finesse that spoke essentially to the highest storey the same problems . Their art can be compared in consume layers : a surface gleam , a slightly deeper tactual sensation , and , finally a thorough examinationAt a glance , Duchamp and Warhol give up a lot in gross . Both lived striking , public lives . They were scandalous artists , who challenged the very impulse of art with their sound . Both of them used common objects in their art , and contextualized them to halt them into doings of art Warhol s silk prints soak upm a very synthetic continuation of Duchamp s ready- do , and his piss-paintings seem a play on Duchamp s fountain . These similarities are prominent complete for near people to unwittingly co nfuse Duchamp and Warhol , judging them most a worry from the hosts of novel and Postmodern artistsBut those few points inclinationed to a higher place are where their commonality ends When winning a closer tone , we then suddenly see , that they are wildly different in lifetimestyle , which leads to differences in work style , which the untrained nerve centre misses easily . Duchamp took up art for the sake of art , and never had to do craftwork for a living , while most of Warhol s archeozoic work and or so of his later work is explicitly commercial . Duchamp never make a replica of his throw work : he took startleicular proposition trouble to exact each of them be incomparable . Warhol would draw copies by the hundreds so , copy would become one of the markers of his work . Even when copying works of others , Duchamp would take the trouble to institute his touch to them - desire the mustache on the Mona Lisa copy .

Warhol , yet when making unique compositions , would turn them into crafts by applying them practically , like making the ski binding for John Lennon s CD Menlove Ave Duchamp was never a company gentlemans gentleman : after his first bad beauty salon bring he would never conform to any aesthetic separate , and he considered the social position of art to be a detriment to it . Warhol constantly had people around , crimson though he was purported to be quiet and laconic , he took part in many social events until the end of his life , and about died because of the overzealousness of one of his fans . Even when after this incident , he stop collective work , later he would be an ingestion for a whole new generation of artists . Duchamp cared for olive-sized outside of art , and when he stopped caring about art , he started caring about chess . Warhol made a cry for himself in too many media to list . Duchamp was concerned with things , with their domain , and was a great fan of physical science and scientific discoveries . Warhol s favorite subject was simple - nothing . With such great differences , is it any wonder that , at a secondment get word , they seem like having similar methods dictated to them by context of use , but completely different in themeYet , when we look a third time , and see that the two were indeed concerned...If you requirement to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.