When President Bill Clinton reluctantly signed the Personal function and
Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, he had an idea of what the
critical responses would be. The wish was to induce a program that would
bring significant benefits to the needy and hungery people of our country.
However, the response and criticisms are equivalent to what our president
expected, very negative.
Mary Jo terror believes the new benefit law poses serious dangers to poor
children and families. As assistant secretary for children and families in
the Department of Health and charitable services, she supported the
administrations efforts to refocus the welfare system on deed and to increase
state flexibility through the waiver process. But in the course of reviewing
state welfare reform proposals, she became concerned that politics and
financial pressures were energy states into a race to the bottom(Bane). As
long as the gray-headed law was in place the federal government could swan on
guaranteed assistance and protections for recipients.
Her fears about what
would happen to poor children when states were no longer required to provide
the modest assurances and protections we insisted on in waiver demonstrations
led her to resign after President Clinton signed the welfare bill (Bane).
The reform takes away national level responsibilities and puts the gold and
responsibility into the individual states. A good amount of flexibility is
provided, which whitethorn or may not result in a positive manner. For instance,
they money could be used on the engagement reform and job preparation, eon others
could find loopholes in the laws, and while their purposes may not be
malicious, the money would not genuinely be carrying out the role intended.
No longer go out cash assistance to dependent children be...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment