Recent Changes to Welfare

When President Bill Clinton reluctantly signed the Personal function and

Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, he had an idea of what the

critical responses would be. The wish was to induce a program that would

bring significant benefits to the needy and hungery people of our country.

However, the response and criticisms are equivalent to what our president

expected, very negative.



Mary Jo terror believes the new benefit law poses serious dangers to poor

children and families. As assistant secretary for children and families in

the Department of Health and charitable services, she supported the

administrations efforts to refocus the welfare system on deed and to increase

state flexibility through the waiver process. But in the course of reviewing

state welfare reform proposals, she became concerned that politics and

financial pressures were energy states into a race to the bottom(Bane). As

long as the gray-headed law was in place the federal government could swan on

guaranteed assistance and protections for recipients.



Her fears about what

would happen to poor children when states were no longer required to provide

the modest assurances and protections we insisted on in waiver demonstrations

led her to resign after President Clinton signed the welfare bill (Bane).



The reform takes away national level responsibilities and puts the gold and

responsibility into the individual states. A good amount of flexibility is

provided, which whitethorn or may not result in a positive manner. For instance,

they money could be used on the engagement reform and job preparation, eon others

could find loopholes in the laws, and while their purposes may not be

malicious, the money would not genuinely be carrying out the role intended.



No longer go out cash assistance to dependent children be...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .