“THE EFFECTS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN CRIMINAL CASES†turn off of Contents I.Cases A.The Casey Anthony case B.The O.J. Simpson case II.Discussion A.Reasons why the two cases appeal to the mass i.The coordination compound issues surrounding the cases ii.Lack of testify to convict the defendants B.Media coverage i.Casey Anthony case ii.O.J. Simpson case C.End result i. obliging lawsuits ii.Where are Casey Anthony and O.J. Simpson now? III.Conclusion IV.Sources Section I. Cases A.State v. Casey Anthony switch off: Whether Casey Anthony (defendant) murdered her 2-year old daughter, Caylee Anthony? RULE: Fifth Amendment “ No someone shall be held to answer for a capital, or oppositewise notorious crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, .., nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due dish of law; ... “ ANALYSIS: The prosecution sought the death penalty and assert the defendant murdered her daughter by administering chloroform, hence applying duct tape, because she wanted to free herself from parental responsibilities. The defendant pleaded “not sinful†to the murder charge.
The defense team, countered that the child had drowned accidentally in the family's swimming pool and that the defendant lied about this and other issues because of a dysfunctional upbringing, which they said included sexual debauch by her father. The prosecution presented four-hundred pieces of evidence, but every piece of evidence was challenged by the defense team. The prosecution called 59 witnesses for 70 distinct testimonies, whereas, the defense called 47 witnesses for 63 different testimonies. The prosecution failed to doom solid evidence to prove that the defendant was guilty of the alleged crime beyond reasonable doubt. CONCLUSION: The defendant was exonerate of first-degree murder, aggravated manslaughter, and aggravated child abuse, but was found guilty on four misdemeanor counts of providing false information to a law... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
The defense team, countered that the child had drowned accidentally in the family's swimming pool and that the defendant lied about this and other issues because of a dysfunctional upbringing, which they said included sexual debauch by her father. The prosecution presented four-hundred pieces of evidence, but every piece of evidence was challenged by the defense team. The prosecution called 59 witnesses for 70 distinct testimonies, whereas, the defense called 47 witnesses for 63 different testimonies. The prosecution failed to doom solid evidence to prove that the defendant was guilty of the alleged crime beyond reasonable doubt. CONCLUSION: The defendant was exonerate of first-degree murder, aggravated manslaughter, and aggravated child abuse, but was found guilty on four misdemeanor counts of providing false information to a law... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment